“I could probably get on and do
some more of the novel, but it’s near ten, and I don’t know if I want to get
onto it tonight. Apart from that, it’s not warm in here, and I’m in the middle
of a bit I’m not enjoying much…although at least I’m writing it. I went back and
began the sequence I’d missed out earlier because I couldn’t work out how to do
it. It wasn’t nearly so hard as I thought. In fact, it’s never the writing that’s
hard, it’s the getting started, and yes, I know I should write at least five
minutes if nothing else, but five minutes is never enough to get into it.”
Note all the excuses: too late in the evening, not warm in the room, writing a section I’m not enjoying writing, five minutes isn't long enough to get started.
On the other hand, note that I was still writing the bit I wasn't enjoying - when I wasn't procrastinating. Furthermore I'd gone back to a section I’d missed out before, discovering I’d worked out how to do it in the meantime. (I think I'm talking about two different sections here in the journal, but I might not be.)
Perhaps seemingly least, but not necessarily: It’s better to write for five minutes
than for no minutes.
Procrastination is my biggest problem. One excuse I didn't use here is: 'I don't know if it's worth carrying on with this book because I've had so many problems with it.' But problems are part and parcel of putting a story together, especially if there's anything complex in the plotting. I've had immense problems with the latest children's story I've been writing for what now seems like years. And have solved most of them eventually. No doubt, since I'm probably only halfway through it, there will be more problems to come.
Anywho, I'm impressed with my younger journal self; I was 60 at the time. I was prepared to keep on writing through a section I wasn't enjoying. Not that this meant it wasn't a good piece to work on, but that it was hard to write.
And it's also encouraging to see that I'd sensibly had left a section aside when I couldn't sort out how to do it - this required guts on my part because I don't like leaving (writing) things undone. even now. But better still, the problem with the section, whatever it was, actually got solved by the fact of leaving it aside.
Lastly: it's better to write for five minutes than not write at all. Why, do you ask? I'm sure you already know the answer, but I'll jot it down anyway, as a reminder to myself as much as anything else. It's better to write for five minutes, because once we've got into that five minutes, we usually carry on writing, and not only does more get done than we anticipated, we remember how much we enjoy the sheer fact of writing...
No comments:
Post a Comment