Wikipedia is rapidly catching up on all sorts of information, including biographies of people. Some of these biographies didn't exist up until relatively recently. Two such are those of the composer Michael Head (1900-1976), and the Episcopalian priest and chef, Robert Farrar Capon - Capon, born in 1925, died earlier this month.
Michael Head was almost entirely a composer of songs, and I've been accompanying people singing Michael Head songs since I first began this role. A large number of his songs have survived in the repertoires of singing teachers and their pupils, and as examination works, and so on. Here's a 'not comprehensive' list of his songs. To my surprise there are far more than I've ever performed, and I'm interested to note that one I heard at the Senior Vocal Competitions the other day, and had never heard before, is actually one of his. When I heard it I said to the person I was sitting beside - that can't be a Michael Head song surely? I thought this mostly because it was quite different in style and tone to many of those I know. But there it is: Back to Hilo.
Head was unusual in that he used to present his songs not by accompanying another singer, but as both singer and accompanist simultaneously. He must be one of the few composers ever to have done this (amongst art song composers, I mean).
I was first introduced to the books of Robert Farrar Capon when I began work at the Otago Church Bookstore. I'd never heard of him before, and was struck by his witty and delightful style, his seeming willingness to go beyond the pale in terms of what might be called orthodox theology (he never went beyond truth, though), and his attempts to surprise us into rethinking parables and stories and Gospel texts we'd heard too many times and had become over-familiar with. I've read most of his books more than once - that is, of the ones I've read once (there are a number I've never got hold of) - and they always bear re-reading.
Sometimes he overdid the wit, and the surreal approach. Sometimes you have to take what he says with a grain of salt, because he can get a little carried away. Sometimes he was almost so clever that you lost the point of what he was saying, but undeniably he has an important place in teaching people about God's grace to humanity, God's love for humanity, and the importance of the cross.
Mike Crowl is the world's leading authority on his own opinions on art, music, movies, and writing.
Pages
- Home
- About Mike Crowl and his books
- Columns from Column 8
- Music I have writ
- One Easter Evening
- When Dad went Fishing
- The Night the Wind Blew the Roof Off
- Plays and Productions since 2004
- The Disenchanted Wizard - the original opening chapters
- Mike Crowl's Scribble Pad
- Taonga columns by the Juggling Bookie
Showing posts with label chef. Show all posts
Showing posts with label chef. Show all posts
Thursday, September 19, 2013
Michael Head & Robert Farrar Capon
Tuesday, October 11, 2011
Why would you....?
One of the things about doing some baking at home is that you keep on asking one particular question: how did that first come about? What I mean is, how, for instance, did someone work out that using gelatine in food was a good idea? Gelatin (or gelatine), as Wikipedia tells us, is a translucent, colorless, brittle (when dry), flavorless, solid substance derived from the collagen inside animals' skin and bones. Who first discovered it anyway, and why would you go from there to using it in food?
Or take this? In one of the recipes we used today we separated the egg white from the egg yolk. Who would have thought this was a good idea, and having separated them, then go on to whisk the white in such a way that it becomes no longer liquid but something that's able to be tipped upside down in the bowl and still stay there? Doesn't that strike you as odd?
All cooking is a kind of chemical experiment, I guess, and each recipe is basically just a set of instructions telling us how to change certain elements from one thing to another, combining them in some cases, altering them in others. But even recipes in themselves are curious: we know from seeing cooking programmes on TV that chefs are always experimenting: but they're experimenting with the things that are known. Who experimented in the first place, and why?
Or take this? In one of the recipes we used today we separated the egg white from the egg yolk. Who would have thought this was a good idea, and having separated them, then go on to whisk the white in such a way that it becomes no longer liquid but something that's able to be tipped upside down in the bowl and still stay there? Doesn't that strike you as odd?
All cooking is a kind of chemical experiment, I guess, and each recipe is basically just a set of instructions telling us how to change certain elements from one thing to another, combining them in some cases, altering them in others. But even recipes in themselves are curious: we know from seeing cooking programmes on TV that chefs are always experimenting: but they're experimenting with the things that are known. Who experimented in the first place, and why?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)